ebradafinancial.com
Menu

joint retirement board: 5 Easy Steps to Get It Right

A joint retirement board is a formal committee that oversees retirement plan administration for multiple employers or a combined workforce. According to th

A joint retirement board is a formal committee that oversees retirement plan administration for multiple employers or a combined workforce. According to the U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration, multiemployer retirement plans governed by joint boards cover millions of American workers across industries like construction, transportation, and hospitality.

The problem most organizations face is that setting up and running a joint retirement board involves complex fiduciary duties, regulatory compliance, and coordination between parties that often have competing interests.

This guide breaks down the five essential steps to establish and operate a joint retirement board correctly. You'll learn what the board actually does, who should serve on it, how to structure it legally, and what ongoing responsibilities you cannot delegate away.

What Is a Joint Retirement Board?

A joint retirement board is a governing body with equal representation from employers and employees (typically through their unions) that manages a retirement plan covering workers from multiple companies.

The board acts as the plan's named fiduciary under ERISA. That means board members carry personal legal responsibility for plan decisions. The U.S. Department of Labor's "Meeting Your Fiduciary Responsibilities" guide states that fiduciaries who fail to follow ERISA's standards "may be personally liable to restore any losses to the plan."

The defining feature is the 50/50 split in board composition. Employers appoint half the trustees. The union or employee group appoints the other half. This balance prevents either side from unilaterally controlling investment decisions, benefit changes, or administrative policies.

How to apply this: Pull your plan documents and verify whether your board has the required equal representation structure before making any governance changes.

Common Types of Plans Governed by Joint Boards

  • Multiemployer pension plans — the most common type, often found in building trades
  • Jointly trusteed health and welfare plans — covering retiree medical benefits
  • Taft-Hartley retirement funds — named after the 1947 labor law that enabled them
  • Apprenticeship retirement savings plans — for training programs with multiple contractors

Step 1: Define the Board's Legal Authority and Scope

Before recruiting trustees, you must establish what the joint retirement board actually controls. This authority comes from the trust agreement, not from casual agreement between parties.

The trust document should specify which decisions require full board approval. Investment policy changes, actuarial assumptions, benefit formula adjustments, and service provider contracts typically need board votes. Day-to-day administrative tasks can be delegated to staff or third-party administrators.

A common scenario involves boards that assume they have authority they do not actually hold. For example, a board might vote to change the plan's vesting schedule, only to discover the trust agreement requires a unanimous vote or a separate amendment process.

The Internal Revenue Service requires that plan documents and trust agreements be followed exactly as written. Failure to follow your own governing documents is one of the most frequent compliance violations the IRS finds in retirement plan audits.

How to apply this: Request a legal review of your trust agreement and create a one-page summary of which decisions the board controls versus which require plan sponsor or collective bargaining approval.

Step 2: Select Trustees with the Right Qualifications

Choosing trustees for a joint retirement board is not about rewarding loyal employees. It is about finding people who can handle fiduciary responsibility.

Ideal trustee candidates should understand basic finance, be willing to ask questions, and commit to attending meetings. The Department of Labor's guidance on fiduciary education emphasizes that trustees do not need to be investment experts, but they must know enough to evaluate advice from professionals.

Consider the case of a mid-sized construction industry joint retirement board that replaced two long-serving trustees. The new trustees brought accounting and risk management backgrounds. Within 18 months, the board identified $40,000 in annual fee savings by renegotiating a legacy investment contract that previous trustees had never questioned.

Trustee selection should also account for continuity. Staggered terms prevent a complete turnover that could disrupt plan oversight. Many trust agreements specify 3-5 year terms with rotating elections.

How to apply this: Create a trustee skills matrix listing the competencies your board needs (investment oversight, legal compliance, benefits administration) and identify gaps before the next election cycle.

Step 3: Establish Investment and Administrative Policies

A joint retirement board needs written policies that guide decisions and protect trustees from liability.

The investment policy statement (IPS) is the board's most important document. It defines asset allocation targets, risk tolerance, performance benchmarks, and procedures for selecting and terminating investment managers. Without an IPS, investment decisions become ad hoc and harder to defend in litigation.

The administrative policy manual covers operational rules: how claims are processed, how participant data is secured, how service providers are monitored, and how board meetings are conducted.

The Government Accountability Office has reported that plans with documented investment policies tend to have more disciplined decision-making during market volatility. During the 2020 market downturn, boards with clear rebalancing rules were less likely to make panic-driven allocation changes.

Your policies should also address cybersecurity. The Department of Labor issued cybersecurity guidance in 2021 that applies to retirement plans, recommending that fiduciaries ask service providers about their security practices and incident response plans.

How to apply this: Draft or update your IPS within the next quarter. If you do not have one, start with a simple one-page asset allocation target and expand from there.

Step 4: Run Effective Board Meetings and Document Decisions

Board meetings are where fiduciary responsibility becomes real. Poorly run meetings create liability. Well-run meetings create a defensible record.

Every joint retirement board meeting should follow a consistent structure:

  1. Review of previous meeting minutes and action items
  2. Investment performance report from advisors or managers
  3. Administrative and compliance updates
  4. Participant service issues
  5. New business and policy decisions
  6. Approval of minutes and adjournment

Documentation matters more than most trustees realize. ERISA does not require a specific format for meeting minutes, but courts and regulators look for evidence that trustees actually reviewed information and made informed decisions. Minutes that simply say "investment report reviewed" are far weaker than minutes that note specific questions asked and the board's reasoning.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation has identified poor documentation as a contributing factor in plans that end up in distress. When decisions cannot be reconstructed, it becomes impossible to prove fiduciary prudence.

How to apply this: Adopt a meeting minutes template that captures discussion points, questions raised by trustees, and the rationale for each board decision. Review minutes at the start of every meeting.

Step 5: Monitor Service Providers and Plan Performance

The final ongoing responsibility of a joint retirement board is oversight of everyone the plan pays: investment managers, actuaries, auditors, attorneys, and third-party administrators.

Monitoring means more than receiving quarterly reports. It means comparing actual performance against benchmarks, reviewing fee disclosures, and asking whether the plan still needs each service it pays for.

The Department of Labor requires plan fiduciaries to review service provider fee disclosures under ERISA Section 408(b)(2). Boards should conduct a formal fee review at least every three years. Many boards discover they are paying for services they no longer use or that fees have drifted above market rates.

Use BrightScope to benchmark your plan's fees against comparable plans. Use Fi360 for fiduciary education and monitoring tools that help trustees track investment performance against IPS benchmarks.

Plan performance should be measured against the goals in your IPS, not against whatever the market happened to do last quarter. A diversified portfolio will underperform the S&P 500 in strong equity markets. That is not failure. It is the intended design.

How to apply this: Schedule a fee benchmarking review this year. Request current fee disclosures from every service provider and compare them against industry benchmarks.

Joint Retirement Board vs. Single-Employer Plan Governance

Feature Joint Retirement Board Single-Employer Plan
Trustee composition Equal employer and union representation Employer-appointed only
Decision authority Board votes on major decisions Employer or plan committee decides
Regulatory oversight ERISA plus Taft-Hartley rules ERISA only
Benefit changes Often require collective bargaining Employer discretion
Fiduciary liability Shared equally by all trustees Concentrated in employer fiduciaries
What to check Trust agreement compliance Plan document and corporate resolutions

Frequently Asked Questions About joint retirement board

Who can legally serve on a joint retirement board?

Any individual appointed according to the trust agreement can serve, provided they accept fiduciary responsibility. The Department of Labor does not require specific credentials. However, trustees with felony convictions related to fraud or breach of fiduciary duty may be barred under ERISA Section 411.

Employers sometimes appoint company officers, while unions typically appoint business agents or officers with financial oversight experience.

What happens if a joint retirement board deadlocks on a decision?

Deadlock is a real risk with equal representation. Many trust agreements include a deadlock resolution mechanism, such as binding arbitration or a neutral umpire. Without such a provision, the plan may be unable to act, which can harm participants.

Some boards adopt a rule that certain administrative decisions require only a simple majority while benefit changes require a supermajority, reducing deadlock frequency.

How often must a joint retirement board meet?

There is no statutory meeting frequency requirement, but fiduciary best practice suggests at least quarterly meetings. The Department of Labor expects trustees to meet as often as necessary to properly oversee the plan. Boards with significant investment activity or ongoing compliance issues may need monthly meetings. A joint retirement board that meets only annually would struggle to demonstrate adequate oversight.

Can a joint retirement board be held personally liable for investment losses?

Yes, if the losses result from a fiduciary breach. ERISA allows participants to sue trustees personally for losses caused by imprudent decisions. However, trustees who follow a documented process, rely on qualified experts, and act according to the IPS are generally protected. The key defense is process, not outcome.

A well-documented decision that loses money is defensible; an undocumented decision that makes money can still be challenged.

What is the difference between a joint retirement board and a plan administrator?

The joint retirement board is the fiduciary body that sets policy and oversees the plan. The plan administrator handles day-to-day operations: processing distributions, maintaining records, and communicating with participants. In many multiemployer plans, the board hires a third-party administrator to serve as plan administrator. The board retains oversight responsibility even when it delegates administrative functions.

Conclusion

A joint retirement board carries serious responsibilities that require structure, documentation, and ongoing diligence.

  • Establish clear legal authority through a properly drafted trust agreement
  • Select trustees for competence and commitment, not political convenience
  • Create written investment and administrative policies that guide decisions
  • Document meetings thoroughly to build a defensible fiduciary record
  • Monitor service providers and fees against objective benchmarks

The work of a joint retirement board is continuous. Start by reviewing your trust agreement and identifying the gaps in your current governance practices. If your board lacks an investment policy statement or has not conducted a fee review in three years, those are your immediate priorities.

Every month of delay increases both fiduciary risk and the likelihood of regulatory scrutiny.